By CityRealty Staff
320.9K Unique Monthly Visitors
A stack of bills awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature includes the “Fair and Transparent Real
Estate Listings Act,
” a measure that would make public marketing the default for residential sale and
rental listings in New York State. The bill does not eliminate private listings outright, but it would
require sellers and landlords to sign a standardized disclosure form before directing their agent to
withhold a listing from public marketing.
For buyers, the issue comes down to access. Listings that never appear on a multiple listing service,
public portal, or broadly accessible platform can be difficult, if not impossible, for many consumers to find.
For sellers, the question is more complicated. Some may value privacy, discretion, or a softer launch
before going fully public. Others may lose out on exposure, competition, and potentially stronger offers if a
property is marketed only to a limited network.
The debate should not be framed as a simple question of whether private listings are good or bad, says
Briggs Elwell, CEO and co-founder of RLTYco, a platform that provides real estate professionals with
knowledge, resources, and support. In Mr. Elwell’s view, the central issue is consumer choice.
“Everyone
has a right with their personal property,
” he said, noting that some sellers have legitimate reasons to
control how widely information about their home is distributed.
In the meantime, the debate has revived an old real estate question: What is the value of a listing if most
of the market never gets to see it? Below, we look at what whisper and private listings are, why they
appeal to certain buyers, sellers, and brokers, what the proposed transparency law could mean for New
York real estate. Finally, we end with a round-up of active listings with upcoming open houses available to
tour for anyone who registers their visit beforehand.
What are whisper listings?
Whisper listings, sometimes called pocket listings or off-market listings, have long existed in residential
real estate. In the simplest terms, they are properties quietly circulated among select agents, buyers, or
broker networks rather than broadly advertised to the public.
The terms “whisper listing,
” “private listing,
” and “off-market listing” are often used interchangeably, but
there are subtle differences. A whisper listing is generally shared informally with a small circle of agents or
qualified buyers. A private listing may be marketed more formally, but only within a brokerage’s internal
network or another restricted-access channel. In both cases, the property may never appear on the MLS
or on major public listing sites.
That restricted visibility is exactly the point for some sellers. A celebrity, high-net-worth individual, or
owner of a particularly distinctive property may not want floor plans, photos, or pricing widely circulated.
Others may want to test pricing before a public launch, avoid open houses, or reduce the disruption of a
traditional marketing campaign.
The history of whisper listings
Whisper listings are not new, but they have attracted greater scrutiny in recent years as more brokerages,
portals, and regulators have debated who benefits when inventory is kept out of public view.In 2019, the National Association of Realtors introduced its Clear Cooperation policy. The policy generally
requires participating listing brokers to submit a property to the MLS within one business day of publicly
marketing it. The goal was to prevent available homes from being fragmented across private channels
and to preserve broader access to listing information.
Even with Clear Cooperation in place, private and off-market listings have continued to play a role in the
city and nationwide. Some brokerages have embraced exclusive internal networks as a way to give
sellers more control over how a home is introduced to the market. Critics argue that these systems
reduce transparency, limit buyer access, and give larger firms an advantage by keeping inventory inside
their own ecosystems.
The pros and cons for consumers
Whether whisper listings are helpful or harmful depends largely on where one sits in the transaction.
For some sellers, especially in the luxury market, private marketing can be appealing. Trophy properties
often trade through relationship-driven networks, and buyers at the highest price points may rely more
heavily on experienced agents than casual online searches. A private listing can also offer discretion,
reduce public exposure, and allow a seller to avoid the time, cost, and inconvenience of staging,
photography, and repeated showings.
Elwell points to celebrities, estate sales, and other sensitive situations as cases where off-market
marketing may be more than a convenience. For a public figure, he noted, news that an apartment is
being listed can invite speculation about career moves, personal circumstances, or finances.
“Imagine if
you heard a player from Knicks listed their apartment for sale, it would invite speculation that the person is
being traded to another team.
” In those cases, privacy may be part of the seller’s best interest, even if
broader exposure could potentially produce a higher price.
For buyers, a whisper listing can feel like a valuable inside track. In a low-inventory market, access to a
property before it is widely publicized may help a buyer avoid a crowded open house or a stressful
bidding war.
“Our responsibility is to serve our clients’ best interests, whether they are buyers or sellers, and broader
market exposure creates the strongest outcome”
– Jenny Lenz, agent, Dolly Lenz Real Estate
But there are tradeoffs. When a listing is withheld from public view, many qualified buyers may
never know it exists. That can reduce competition for the property and may lead to fewer offers,
weaker terms, or a lower final price for the seller. For buyers, private listings can also reinforce an
uneven playing field, favoring those with the right broker relationships while leaving others dependent on
incomplete public inventory.
This is the central consumer issue at the heart of the transparency debate. Since the rise of online
listings, buyers have had unprecedented access to housing information. Whisper listings move some of
that information back behind closed doors.
The pros and cons for agents and brokerages
Agents and brokerages also have a clear stake in the future of private listings.
In some cases, an off-market transaction may allow a listing agent, team, or brokerage to keep more
control over the deal. If the buyer is found internally or through a limited network, the listing side may be
more likely to capture both sides of the commission or keep the transaction within the same firm. For
large brokerages with deep rosters of agents and clients, private listing networks can be a powerful
business advantage.Smaller and independent brokerages may see the issue differently. If large firms are able to keep more
inventory inside their own systems, agents outside those networks may have fewer listings to show their
buyers. That can affect competition not only among buyers, but also among brokers trying to serve them.
This helps explain why policies such as Clear Cooperation and laws like New York’s proposed Fair and
Transparent Real Estate Listings Act are so divisive. Supporters see them as necessary safeguards for
market access and fair competition. Opponents argue that sellers should have more freedom to decide
how, when, and where their homes are marketed.
The Fair and Transparent Real Estate Listing Act
The Fair and Transparent Real Estate Listings Act would require timely public advertising or
marketing of residential properties on platforms accessible to the general public and to real estate
licensees representing prospective buyers or tenants. In practice, this means a listing agent would
generally need to market a property on an MLS or another public, broadly accessible platform unless the
seller or landlord signs a required opt-out disclosure.
The bill’s stated purpose is to promote fair housing opportunity, market competition, and accurate price
discovery. It is also aimed at reducing the use of private or limited-access listing channels that make
some homes visible only to select brokers, buyers, or brokerage networks.
Importantly, the bill would not ban private marketing altogether. Sellers and landlords could still
choose to keep a property off public platforms, but only after acknowledging the potential risks in writing.
Elwell questioned whether the proposed disclosure requirement would materially change seller behavior.
He compared the opt-out form to a kind of “nutritional label” for private listings, designed to make the risks
clearer rather than remove the option altogether. Sellers who truly need privacy, he said, are still likely to
choose an off-market strategy after acknowledging that public exposure may bring more buyers and
potentially a higher price.
Main points of the bill
●
Public marketing would become the default. Listing agents would generally be required to
publicly advertise or market residential properties for sale or lease on an MLS or another platform
accessible to the public and to licensed agents representing buyers or tenants.
●
Private and limited-access channels would be restricted. If a property is marketed through a
private brokerage network or other restricted channel, it would also need to be marketed publicly
at the same time unless the seller or landlord opts out.
●
Sellers and landlords could still choose privacy. The bill preserves the option for non-public
marketing, but only if the seller or landlord signs a standardized opt-out disclosure before or at
the time of entering into the listing agreement.
●
The opt-out form would explain the risks. The required disclosure would warn that withholding
a listing from public marketing may reduce visibility, limit online exposure, lead to fewer offers,
affect price or timing, and cannot be used in a discriminatory way.
●
Agents would have recordkeeping obligations. Listing agents would need to keep the signed
opt-out form for at least three years and make it available to the Department of State upon
request.
●
The Department of State would oversee implementation. The Department would issue rules
and make the standardized disclosure form publicly available.
●
Penalties could increase. The bill would raise the maximum fine for certain real estate licensee
violations from $2,000 to $5,000.
●
The law would not require open houses. Sellers and landlords would not be forced to hold
open houses or allow showings that violate their rights under state or federal law, including
health, safety, and security protections.It is important to note that sellers or landlords can still list privately under the Fair and Transparent Real
Estate Listings Act. They will simply be required to sign a disclosure form acknowledging the risks of
withholding their listing from public marketing, including fewer offers and possibly a lower sales price.
Compass broker Leonard Steinberg told the New York Post that his firm already provides such
disclosure forms, and he supports the bill for that reason. Many other real estate professionals concur.
Less competition, more privacy, or less exposure?
The debate over whisper listings is not simple. In certain situations, private marketing can serve a
legitimate purpose. A seller may have privacy concerns, security concerns, or a desire to avoid the
disruption of a full public launch. A buyer may benefit from learning about a home before it becomes
widely known.
But the larger question is whether a housing market works best when available properties are visible to
everyone or when access depends on private networks. New York’s proposed transparency law comes
down on the side of broader access, while still leaving room for sellers and landlords who knowingly
choose a quieter path.
For consumers, public listings remain the clearest view of what
https://www.cityrealty.com/nyc/market-insight/features/get-to-know/what-new-yorks-transparency-bill-could-mean-whi
sper-listings-public-listings-open-houses/54362




